From:
10 Downing Street
To: e-petition signatories
Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2007 1:54 AM
Subject: E-petition: Response from the Prime Minister
E-petition:
Response from the Prime Minister
|
The
e-petition asking the Prime Minister to "Scrap the planned
vehicle tracking and road pricing policy" has now closed.
This is a response from the Prime Minister, Tony Blair. |
Thank
you for taking the time to register your views about road pricing
on the Downing Street website.
This petition was posted shortly before we published the Eddington
Study, an independent review of Britain's transport network.
This study set out long-term challenges and options for our
transport network.
It made clear that congestion is a major problem to which there
is no easy answer. One aspect of the study was highlighting
how road pricing could provide a solution to these problems
and that advances in technology put these plans within our reach.
Of course it would be ten years or more before any national
scheme was technologically, never mind politically, feasible.
That is the backdrop to this issue. As my response makes clear,
this is not about imposing "stealth taxes" or introducing
"Big Brother" surveillance. This is a complex subject,
which cannot be resolved without a thorough investigation of
all the options, combined with a full and frank debate about
the choices we face at a local and national level. That's why
I hope this detailed response will address your concerns and
set out how we intend to take this issue forward. I see this
email as the beginning, not the end of the debate, and the links
below provide an opportunity for you to take it further.
But let me be clear straight away: we have not made any decision
about national road pricing. Indeed we are simply not yet in
a position to do so. We are, for now, working with some local
authorities that are interested in establishing local schemes
to help address local congestion problems. Pricing is not being
forced on any area, but any schemes would teach us more about
how road pricing would work and inform decisions on a national
scheme. And funds raised from these local schemes will be used
to improve transport in those areas.
One thing I suspect we can all agree is that congestion is bad.
It's bad for business because it disrupts the delivery of goods
and services. It affects people's quality of life. And it is
bad for the environment. That is why tackling congestion is
a key priority for any Government.
Congestion is predicted to increase by 25% by 2015. This is
being driven by economic prosperity. There are 6 million more
vehicles on the road now than in 1997, and predictions are that
this trend will continue.
Part of the solution is to improve public transport, and to
make the most of the existing road network. We have more than
doubled investment since 1997, spending £2.5 billion this
year on buses and over £4 billion on trains - helping
to explain why more people are using them than for decades.
And we're committed to sustaining this investment, with over
£140 billion of investment planned between now and 2015.
We're also putting a great deal of effort into improving traffic
flows - for example, over 1000 Highways Agency Traffic Officers
now help to keep motorway traffic moving.
But all the evidence shows that improving public transport and
tackling traffic bottlenecks will not by themselves prevent
congestion getting worse. So we have a difficult choice to make
about how we tackle the expected increase in congestion. This
is a challenge that all political leaders have to face up to,
and not just in the UK. For example, road pricing schemes are
already in operation in Italy, Norway and Singapore, and others,
such as the Netherlands, are developing schemes. Towns and cities
across the world are looking at road pricing as a means of addressing
congestion.
One option would be to allow congestion to grow unchecked. Given
the forecast growth in traffic, doing nothing would mean that
journeys within and between cities would take longer, and be
less reliable. I think that would be bad for businesses, individuals
and the environment. And the costs on us all will be real -
congestion could cost an extra £22 billion in wasted time
in England by 2025, of which £10-12 billion would be the
direct cost on businesses. |
|
A
second option would be to try to build our way out of congestion.
We could, of course, add new lanes to our motorways, widen
roads in our congested city centres, and build new routes
across the countryside. Certainly in some places new capacity
will be part of the story. That is why we are widening the
M25, M1 and M62. But I think people agree that we cannot simply
build more and more roads, particularly when the evidence
suggests that traffic quickly grows to fill any new capacity.
Tackling congestion in this way would also be extremely costly,
requiring substantial sums to be diverted from other services
such as education and health, or increases in taxes. If I
tell you that one mile of new motorway costs as much as £30m,
you'll have an idea of the sums this approach would entail.
That is why I believe that at least we need to explore the
contribution road pricing can make to tackling congestion.
It would not be in anyone's interests, especially those of
motorists, to slam the door shut on road pricing without exploring
it further.
It has been calculated that a national scheme - as part of
a wider package of measures - could cut congestion significantly
through small changes in our overall travel patterns. But
any technology used would have to give definite guarantees
about privacy being protected - as it should be. Existing
technologies, such as mobile phones and pay-as-you-drive insurance
schemes, may well be able to play a role here, by ensuring
that the Government doesn't hold information about where vehicles
have been. But there may also be opportunities presented by
developments in new technology. Just as new medical technology
is changing the NHS, so there will be changes in the transport
sector. Our aim is to relieve traffic jams, not create a "Big
Brother" society.
I know many people's biggest worry about road pricing is that
it will be a "stealth tax" on motorists. It won't.
Road pricing is about tackling congestion.
Clearly if we decided to move towards a system of national
road pricing, there could be a case for moving away from the
current system of motoring taxation. This could mean that
those who use their car less, or can travel at less congested
times, in less congested areas, for example in rural areas,
would benefit from lower motoring costs overall. Those who
travel longer distances at peak times and in more congested
areas would pay more. But those are decisions for the future.
At this stage, when no firm decision has been taken as to
whether we will move towards a national scheme, stories about
possible costs are simply not credible, since they depend
on so many variables yet to be investigated, never mind decided.
Before we take any decisions about a national pricing scheme,
we know that we have to have a system that works. A system
that respects our privacy as individuals. A system that is
fair. I fully accept that we don't have all the answers yet.
That is why we are not rushing headlong into a national road
pricing scheme. Before we take any decisions there would be
further consultations. The public will, of course, have their
say, as will Parliament.
We want to continue this debate, so that we can build a consensus
around the best way to reduce congestion, protect the environment
and support our businesses. If you want to find out more,
please visit the attached links to more detailed information,
and which also give opportunities to engage in further debate.
Yours sincerely,
Tony Blair
|
Further
information |
Both
the 10 Downing Street and Department for Transport websites
offer much more information about road pricing.
This includes a range of independent viewpoints, both for
and against. You can also read the Eddington
Report in full.
You can reply to this email by posting a question to Roads
Minister Dr. Stephen Ladyman in a webchat on the No 10 website
this Thursday.
There will be further opportunities in the coming months to
get involved in the debate. You will receive one final e-mail
from Downing Street to update you in due course.
If you would like to opt out of receiving further mail on
this or any other petitions you signed, please email optout@petitions.pm.gov.uk |
|