|
How
is the MG Car Club run and what say do members have?
This NEWS
item provides a report on a question raised by Jerry Birkbeck
of the Y Type Register at the recent six monthly meeting of
the Club Council, who suggested changes to the Club's governance,
particularly to the voting system and arrangements for the Club's
AGM. The note then sets out the current Club voting arrangements
and highlights real concerns raised by several Council members
at that meeting with the suggested changes. Whilst no vote was
taken, it was clear that most members attending that Council
meeting felt unconvinced by the suggested changes. Many felt
they saw few signs that Jerry Birkbeck accepted the reasoning
or logic behind those concerns and the sensible need for the
present voting system. As it is likely this topic may arise
again, this note aims to set out details of the current system
and the reasoning behind the real concerns over the changes
suggested by Jerry Birkbeck.
If you have any views on MG Car Club governance or the Club's
voting arrangements, do let the V8 Secretary, Debbie Brading,
know so we are aware of what you feel or suggest. Email
For further information on the Club structure and governance,
see our webpage. More
Posted:
121121
|

|
A
question was raised by Jerry Birkbeck (Y Type Register)
for discussion at the Club Council meeting held
on Saturday 10th November 2012. He proposed "one
member, one vote" rather than the present
arrangement where one representative of each
CRB (Centre, Register and Branch) with a |
|
vote
at Council and at general meetings of the MG Car
Club. He suggested that to encourage greater participation
by members, holding the Club's AGM as a stand
alone event with a guest speaker would be an added
attraction.
Several members responded explaining the reasons
for the present Club voting arrangement and expressing
concerns over the unintended risks that could
arise from the changed voting system suggested
by Jerry Birkbeck.
What is the present voting system?
There is a prudent provision in the Club's Articles
of Association that those entitled to vote at
the Club's Council meetings and at general meetings
of the MG Car Club Limited are the Voting Members,
each a representative of their individual CRB.
Two representatives from each CRB are entitled
to attend those meetings, one of whom is the Voting
Member. Their role is to represent the views of
the members of their CRB so far as they are able.
The views of their CRB members may be gathered
from either correspondence or direct contact with
their members or from matters raised and discussed
at general meetings of their CRB. Voting Members
are however representatives rather than delegates,
an important distinction.
The
Club's voting system was last examined in 2006
when an Articles Committee was set up by Council
to review the Memorandum and Articles of Association.
That committee, chaired by Dick Morbey (MMM Register
chairman), continued the present voting system
in their redraft of the Club's Articles of Association
which was adopted at a Club AGM in 2006.
What scope is there for Club members' involvement
in CRB affairs and voting opportunities?
Club members are able to vote for the election
of the committee members of a CRB at the annual
general meetings of the CRB and indeed can be
members of more than one CRB - for example of
a Centre and of a Register or several Registers.
So the views of Club members can be made through
the CRB or CRBs of which they are a member and
they can vote for the election of their CRB committee
members too.
What outcome do we want from good Club governance?
Our aim is to ensure the Club is well run in terms
of the quality of the support and scope of services
it provides for Club members and that its finances
are run in a prudent and professional manner.
It's important that the present system of Club
governance encourages those aims and also encourages
members to volunteer for key roles on their CRB
committees and the Executive Committee who have
real ability and skills in managing the business
and organisation of a true members' motor club.
A practical aspect is the geographical spread
of the members of the Club in the UK is wide so
the likelihood of many members being able to attend
a general meeting of the Club, even if attached
to an event providing additional attractions,
is relatively low because the distances many members
would need to travel would be considerable. The
likely outcome is Club general meetings would
not be very well attended and consequently might
not be representative of the views of Club members
as a whole.
The single issue group or "takeover"
risk
A real concern with a members' club with a countywide
membership is that if an alternative system were
to be adopted where each Club member had a vote
at general meetings of the Club, a single issue
group or a group of members intent on taking over
the Club could very easily arrange for a large
number of their supporters to attend the meeting
and by strength of numbers win key votes on both
the usual agenda items and on any special motions
the group had tabled to give effect to their single
issue concerns or intent. So in that case a reasonable
view would be that disproportionate representation
by a single issue group could lead a situation
that could very easily misrepresent the views
or wishes of the majority, many of whom are happy
to play a passive role in their Club's affairs.
Would that be a desirable outcome and would it
represent the wishes of the majority? Many members
feel that is unlikely but a greater concern would
be a real risk the Club could be taken over by
that small group attending a general meeting.
Protection of minority interests
The present voting system gives equal votes to
each CRB regardless of how many members it has,
thus protecting CRBs which have a small number
of members, an important concern as CRBs differ
greatly in membership numbers. Without this protection
the two largest CRBs would effectively control
the Club and could push through measures against
the interests of the smaller CRBs.
Effectiveness of the present CRB representatives
system with Voting Member rights
This system has been seen to work during difficult
periods for the Club over the last decade, for
example when overambitious Club office development
plans were promoted by the Club's Executive Committee
(the Board). In cases like that the Council, as
a representative body with the general role of
monitoring the Board and the ability to vote on
motions at Council meetings together with their
voting rights at general meetings of the Club,
has been able to exercise good governance over
the Board and the Club's affairs. The proposal
to move to a system of one member-one vote at
general meetings of the Club is seen by many with
experience of the Club's affairs as misguided
as it does not seem to recognise the success of
the present Club governance arrangement and the
realities or the dangers from an unrepresentative
single issue group applying a disproportionate
influence on the Club's affairs and prospects.
Many Club members feel our current voting system
protects the interests of Club members far more
effectively
We heard at the Council meeting that the proposal
put forward for discussion by Jerry Birkbeck had
not had full discussion with his Y Type Register
committee or at their AGM which many felt was
not an encouraging feature for a proposal seeking
to make a major reform of Club governance. "One
member one vote" has a superficial appeal
as a democratic slogan, but "one CRB one
vote" - our current system - actually protects
the interests of Club members far more effectively.
If you have any views on Club governance or the
Club's voting arrangements, do let the V8 Secretary,
Debbie Brading, know so we know what you feel
or suggest. Email
For further information on the Club structure
and governance, see our webpage. More
|
|
|